Pretty Funny

**UTVols2** · January 13th, 2008, 07:33 PM

Nebraska (hmmmm, they have been a powerhouse this past decade), USC (Lost), LSU (Lost twice), the hardest teams you have played in the last decade and you got beat. When you all finally win a big game against a worthy opponent we will continue this discussion.

I am glad Tech has scheduled 6 tough games in 10 years...... Awesome.

**Ironlung** · January 13th, 2008, 07:33 PM

UT has Oklahoma, Nebraska, Oregon, and OSU all coming up in future schedules. Cal was better last year than Nebraska was or will be whenever or if VT plays them. They also play UGA, UF, LSU, Auburn, Bama, SC in conference. Which is more than any ACC team can say.

**gcdevil22** · January 13th, 2008, 07:33 PM

ask Gary Williams

**gcdevil22** · January 13th, 2008, 07:34 PM

VT has Ohio St. on a future schedule as well

**Ironlung** · January 13th, 2008, 07:35 PM

You're barking up the wrong tree if you want to try to bang on UT for scheduling.

**gcdevil22** · January 13th, 2008, 07:36 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: UTVols2</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> LSU (Lost twice) </div></div>

wrong...LSU got beat 26-8 when they came to Blacksburg

**UTVols2** · January 13th, 2008, 07:37 PM

Just face it VT, you can't win this argument, you haven't made sense in the last 20 post, just give it up [img]/LDPforum/ubbthreads/images/%%GRAEMLIN_URL%%/smile.gif[/img]

You can't defend VT Football, it is pointless.

**imported_GC1** · January 13th, 2008, 07:37 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: UTVols2</div><div class="ubbcode-body">Nebraska (hmmmm, they have been a powerhouse this past decade), USC (Lost), LSU (Lost twice), the hardest teams you have played in the last decade and you got beat. When you all finally win a big game against a worthy opponent we will continue this discussion.

I am glad Tech has scheduled 6 tough games in 10 years...... Awesome. </div></div>

I'd check my sources as VT and LSU split. VT won the 1st meeting 26-8 if I'm not mistaken.

**UTVols2** · January 13th, 2008, 07:38 PM

<div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: vthokie22</div><div class="ubbcode-body"><div class="ubbcode-block"><div class="ubbcode-header">Originally Posted By: UTVols2</div><div class="ubbcode-body"> LSU (Lost twice) </div></div>

wrong...LSU got beat 26-8 when they came to Blacksburg </div></div>

My bad, I missed one. It is hard when I have had to try and prove 30 points in a thread, just missed that one.

**pvfan** · January 13th, 2008, 07:38 PM

Haha, I've never been to a Maryland game in my life when I didn't wear either a Maryland jersey or Polo. You've never played for the ACC Title in Basketball, look up the ACC rules. It's the Tournament winner who is recognized champion. Duke has three national titles in Basketball alone. Duke and Carolina Basketball will always be what the ACC is about, and I hate them both. VT is not even thought of by most in the core of the ACC, it's about tradition and that tradition is in the state of NC. Until VT wins a national title or hell even win a BCS game after winning the ACC in football they will be looked at as jokes. Since they joined the conference there are at least 4 schools who have won national titles that I know of in pretty well known sports. So at least 1/3 of the league has already accomplished more in the last 3 years than VT has in the schools history athletically. Now if you'd like to continue responding to this thread go ahead, personally I'd be to embarrassed.